引用本文: 梁雪，赵芳芳，刘巧玲，何兆华，孙红先，席启明，樊慧梅，李少斌. 菊粉和单宁对肉羊生长、屠宰性能及肉品质的影响. 草业科学, 2022, 39(0): 1-8 doi: shu

Citation: LIANG X, ZHAO F F, LIU Q L, HE Z H, SUN H X, XI Q M, FAN H M, LI S B. Effects of inulin and tannin on growth, slaughter performance, and meat quality of Mutton sheep. Pratacultural Science, 2022, 39(0): 1-8 doi: shu

菊粉和单宁对肉羊生长、屠宰性能及肉品质的影响

甘肃农业大学甘肃省草食动物生物技术重点实验室/甘肃农业大学动物科学技术学院, 甘肃兰州 730070

作者简介: 梁雪(1997-)，女,甘肃民勤人,在读硕士生,研究方向为草食动物生产与改良。E-mail: 15294163997@139.com

通讯作者: 李少斌(1983-)，男, 山西汾阳人副研究员, 博士, 主要研究方向草食动物遗传育种。Email: lisb@gasu.edu.cn

基金项目: 甘肃省自然基金(20JR10RA536)；甘肃省高等学校创新基金(2020B-124)；甘肃农业大学伏羲青年英才项目(Gaufx-03Y04)；甘肃省重大专项(18YF1WA082)

摘要: 选用体况良好、体重一致(25.80 ± 3.85) kg的湖羊公羔(断奶) 24只，采用随机区组试验设计,分成4组，每组6只，分别饲喂基础饲粮(对照组)，基础日粮 + 0.1%菊粉(试验Ⅰ组)基础日粮 + 0.1%菊粉 + 2%单宁(试验Ⅱ组)、基础日粮 + 0.1%菊粉 + 2%单宁 + 4%聚乙二醇(试验Ⅲ组)，测定平均日增重(ADG)、干物质采食量(DMI)、料重比(FCR)、养分表观消化率、宰前活重、胴体重屠宰率、眼肌面积、pH、熟肉率、系水力、剪切力和肉色，分析饲粮中添加菊粉和单宁对湖羊生长、屠宰性能及肉品质的影响。结果表明：处理组间ADG、DMI、FCR、宰前活重、胴体重、屠宰率以及眼肌面积均无显著差异(P > 0.05)；试验Ⅰ组熟肉率显著高于试验Ⅲ组(P = 0.042)，而与对照组和试验Ⅱ组差异不显著(P > 0.05)；试验Ⅱ组系水力显著高于对照组和试验Ⅲ组(P < 0.01)，而与试验Ⅰ组差异不显著(P > 0.05)；对照组和试验Ⅰ组剪切力显著高于试验Ⅱ组及试验Ⅲ组(P < 0.01)；对照组pH_45min显著高于其他3组(P < 0.05)，试验Ⅰ组与试验Ⅲ组pH_45min差异不显著而显著高于试验Ⅱ组；试验Ⅰ组、试验Ⅱ组L*24、a*24、b*24均显著高于其他两组(P < 0.05)。并且菊粉与单宁对各营养物质表观消化率有较显著的影响。综上可知，菊粉单独添加或菊粉和单宁共同添加对湖羊的系水力、剪切力和肉色以及各营养物质表观消化率有一定的改善作用。

关键词:

English

Effects of inulin and tannin on growth, slaughter performance, and meat quality of Mutton sheep

Key Laboratory of Herbivore Biotechnology of Gansu Province/College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China

Corresponding author: LI Shaobin　E-mail: lisb@gasu.edu.cn

Received Date: 2021-07-17
Accepted Date: 2021-10-13
Available Online: 2022-04-30

Abstract: Twenty-four Hu lambs (weaned) with similar body weight (25.80 ± 3.85 kg) were selected and divided into four groups of six lambs each, using a randomized block design. Lambs in the control group were fed a basal diet, while treatment groups were fed basal diet + 0.1% inulin (test group Ⅰ), basal diet + 0.1% inulin + 2% tannin (test group Ⅱ), and basal diet + 0.1% inulin + 2% tannin + 4% polyethylene glycol (test group Ⅲ). The average daily gain (ADG), dry matter intake (DMI), material weight ratio (FCR), apparent digestibility of nutrients, live weight, body weight before slaughter, slaughter rate, eye muscle area, pH, cooked meat rate, hydraulic capacity, shear force, incarnadine, sheep growth, slaughter performance, and meat quality were determined. The results showed that there were no significant differences in the ADG, DMI, FCR, live weight before slaughter, carcass weight, slaughter rate, and eye muscle area among treatment groups (P > 0.05). The cooked meat rate in test group Ⅰ was significantly higher than that in test group Ⅲ (P = 0.042). However, there was no significant difference in the cooked meat rate between the control group and test group Ⅱ (P > 0.05). The hydraulic power of test group Ⅱ was significantly higher than that of the control group and test group Ⅲ (P < 0.01), and there was no significant difference with experimental group Ⅰ (P > 0.05). The shear forces in control group and test group Ⅰ were significantly higher than those in test groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ (P < 0.01). PH_45min in the control group was significantly higher than that in all three treatment groups (P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in pH_45min between test group Ⅰ and test group Ⅲ, but these were significantly higher than that in test group Ⅱ. L*24, A *24 and B *24 in test group Ⅰ and test group Ⅱ were significantly higher than those in the other two groups (P < 0.05). Inulin and tannin had a significant effect on the apparent digestibility of nutrients. In conclusion, inulin alone or in combination with tannin can improve the hydraulic capacity, shear force, meat color, and nutrient apparent digestibility of Hu sheep to a certain extent.

Key words:

1. [1]
  VANDEPUTTE D, FALONY G, VIEIRA-SILVA S, WANG J, SAILER M, THEIS S, VERBEKE K, RAES J. Prebiotic inulin-type fructans induce specific changes in the human gut microbiota[J]. GutGut, 2017, 66(11): 1968-1974. doi:
2. [2]
  魏轶男, 黄倩倩, 吕亚军. 菊粉对肉仔鸡生长性能、免疫器官指数及抗氧化指标的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 41(11): 13-18.
  WEI Y N, HUANG Q Q, LU Y J. Effects of inulin on growth performance, immune organ indicesand antioxidant indices of Broilers[J]. Journal of Northwest A& F University (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 41(11): 13-18.
3. [3]
  TARANU I, MARIN D E, UNTEA A E, JANCZYK P, SOUFFRANT W B, MOTIU M, CRISTE R D, STANCU M, CALIN L. Effect of dietary natural supplements on immune response and mineral bioavailability in piglets after weaning[J]. Czech Journal of Animal ScienceCzech Journal of Animal Science, 2012, 57(7): 332-343. doi:
4. [4]
  SALINAS M V, HAMET M F, BINAGHI J, ABRAHAM A G, WEISSTAUB A R, ZULETA A, FERRERPR D, PUPPO M C. Calcium-inulin wheat bread: prebiotic effect and bone mineralisation in growing rats[J]. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2017, 52(11): 2463-2470. doi:
5. [5]
  宫强, 阮梦蝶, 马丽苹, 牛明福, 任国艳, 侯颖, 秦翠丽, 孙晓菲, 李阳. 菊粉对小鼠的免疫调节作用[J]. 食品科学食品科学, 2016, 37(07): 204-207.
  GONG Q, RUAN M D, MA L P, NIU M F, REN G Y, HOU Y, QIN C L, SUN X F, LI Y. Effects of inulin on immune regulation in mice[J]. Food scienceFood science, 2016, 37(07): 204-207.
6. [6]
  花城, 陈立祥, 燕富永, 刘超良. 菊粉对断奶仔猪血液生化指标的影响[J]. 中国饲料中国饲料, 2008, (14): 27-29. doi:
  HUA C, CHEN L X, YAN F Y, LIU C L. Effects of inulin on blood biochemical indices of weaned piglets[J]. China FeedChina Feed, 2008, (14): 27-29. doi:
7. [7]
  朱晓振. 菊粉及其短链脂肪酸酯对糖尿病和肥胖小鼠代谢和肠道微生态的影响[J]. 烟台:中国科学院大学(中国科学院烟台海岸带研究所)博士论文, 2020, (): 296-305.
  ZHU X Z. Effects of inulin and its short-chain fatty acid esters on metabolism and intestinal microecology in diabetic and obese mice. PhD Thesis[J]. Yantai:University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, CAS), 2020, (): 296-305.
8. [8]
  王甜, 王雪, 李庆敏, 周玉香. 复合化学处理稻草饲粮中添加甘露寡糖对滩羊生产性能及抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 动物营养学报动物营养学报, 2021, 33(4): 2136-2145. doi:
  WANG T, WANG X, LI Q M, ZHOU Y X. Effects of adding mannan oligosaccharides on performanceand antioxidant capacity of tan sheep fed a compound chemically treated rice straw diet[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal NutritionChinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(4): 2136-2145. doi:
9. [9]
  MIN B R, HERNANDEZ K, PINCHAK W E, ANDERSON R C, MILLER J E, VALENCIA E. Effects ofplant tannin extracts supplementation on animal performance and gastrointestinal parasites infestation in steers grazing winter wheat[J]. Journal of animal sciencesJournal of animal sciences, 2015, 5(3): 343-350. doi:
10. [10]
  张高娜, 李金敏, 徐海燕, 谷巍. 单宁酸在畜牧生产中的应用[J]. 广东饲料广东饲料, 2017, 26(6): 39-40. doi:
  ZHANG G N, LI J M, XU H Y, GU W. Application of tannic acid in animal husbandry[J]. Guangdong FeedGuangdong Feed, 2017, 26(6): 39-40. doi:
11. [11]
  HASSAN Z M, MANYELO T G, SELALEDI L, MABELEBELE M. The effects of tannins in monogastric animals with special reference to alternative feed ingredients[J]. Molecules OnlineMolecules Online, 2020, 25(20): 4680-.
12. [12]
  昝林森. 牛生产学(第三版). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2017.
  ZAN L S. Cattle Production Science (Third Edition). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2017.
13. [13]
  杨胜. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术. 北京: 北京农业大学出版社, 1996.
  YANG S. Feed analysis and feed quality testing technology. Beijing: Agricultural University Press, 1996.
14. [14]
  VAN S P J, ROBERTSON J B, LEWIS B A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, andnonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J]. Journal of Dairy ScienceJournal of Dairy Science, 1991, 74(10): 3583-3597. doi:
15. [15]
  王维康, 陈代文, 余冰, 黄志清, 毛湘冰, 郑萍, 虞洁, 罗钧秋, 罗玉衡, 阎辉, 何军. 菊粉对断奶仔猪生长性能、养分表观消化率及抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 动物营养学报动物营养学报, 2021, 33(2): 760-768. doi:
  WANG W K, CHEN D W, YU B, HUANG Z Q, MAO X B, ZHENG P, YU J, LUO J Q, LUO Y H, YANH, HE J. Effects of inulin on growth performance, nutrient apparent digestibility and antioxidant capacityof weaned piglets[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal NutritionChinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(2): 760-768. doi:
16. [16]
  顾宪红, 张名涛, 杨琳, 张琪, 李文英, 任鹏, 张俊, 汪儆. 菊粉对断奶仔猪大肠微生物区系及生产性能的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报畜牧兽医学报, 2005, 36(4): 333-336. doi:
  GU X H, ZHANG M T, YANG L, ZHANG Q, LI W Y, REN P, ZHANG J, WANG J. Effect of inulin on microflora of large intestine and performance in weaning piglets[J]. Acta Veterinaria Et Zootechnica SinicaActa Veterinaria Et Zootechnica Sinica, 2005, 36(4): 333-336. doi:
17. [17]
  王中华, 周德忠. 菊粉对断奶仔猪生长性能和免疫功能的作用研究[J]. 饲料工业饲料工业, 2011, 32(24): 36-38. doi:
  WANG Z H, ZHOU D Z. Influenc of inulin on growth performance and immune function of weaned piglets[J]. Feed industryFeed industry, 2011, 32(24): 36-38. doi:
18. [18]
  唐青松, 徐娥, 熊海涛, 肖明飞, 李景上, 易宏波. 缩合单宁对断奶仔猪生长性能和腹泻的影响[J]. 饲料工业饲料工业, 2020, 41(21): 37-41.
  TANG Q S, XU E, XIONG H T, XIAO M F, LI J S, YI H B. Effects of condensing tannin on growth performance and diarrhea of weaned piglets[J]. Feed IndustryFeed Industry, 2020, 41(21): 37-41.
19. [19]
  李军辉, 解玉怀, 张少涛, 李敏, 李世印, 徐青青, 张小东, 张成喜, 杨维仁. 饲粮中添加水解单宁酸对肉鸡生长性能及肠道健康的影响[J]. 动物营养学报动物营养学报, 2021, 33(5): 2642-2651.
  LI J H, XIE Y H, ZHANG S T, LI M, LI S Y, XU Q Q, ZHANG X D, ZHANG C X, YANG WR. Effects of dietary hydrolyzed tannic acid on growth performance and intestinal health of broilers[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal NutritionChinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(5): 2642-2651.
20. [20]
  金亚东, 杨万宗, 吴爽, 周玉香. 饲粮精料比例对羊屠宰性能和肉品质的影响及其作用机理[J]. 动物营养学报动物营养学报, 2019, 31(10): 4450-4457.
  JIN Y D, YANG W Z, WU S, ZHOU Y X. Effects of dietary concentrate ratio on slaughter performanceand meat quality of sheep and its mechanism[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal NutritionChinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019, 31(10): 4450-4457.
21. [21]
  张艺. 日粮中添加菊粉对生长育肥猪生长性能、胴体性状和肉质的影响[J]. 广东饲料广东饲料, 2020, 29(3): 52-.
  ZHANG Y. Effects of inulin supplementation on growth performance, carcass traits and meat qualityof growing-finishing pigs[J]. Guangdong FeedGuangdong Feed, 2020, 29(3): 52-.
22. [22]
  赵官正, 黄琬芯, 王维祎, 石哲铭, 牛俊丽, 魏莲清, 聂存喜. 棉籽糖对白羽肉鸡生长性能、屠宰性能、养分表观消化率和肠道菌群的影响[J]. 饲料研究饲料研究, 2020, 43(9): 25-29.
  ZHAO G Z, HUANG W X, WANG W Y, SHI Z M, NIU J L, WEI L Q, NIE C X. Effects of raffinose on growth performance, carcass traits, apparent digestibility of nutrients and cecum flora of white-feathered broilers[J]. Feed ResearchFeed Research, 2020, 43(9): 25-29.
23. [23]
  GUARAGNI A, BOIAGO M M, BOTTARI N B, MORSCH V M, LOPES T F, SILVA A S. Feed supplementation with inulin on broiler performance and meat quality challenged with clostridium perfringens: infection and prebiotic impacts[J]. Microbial PathogenesisMicrobial Pathogenesis, 2019, 139(): 103889-.
24. [24]
  李超, 郭瑞萍. 菊粉对育肥猪生产性能、血脂水平和胴体品质的影响[J]. 中国饲料中国饲料, 2014, (20): 19-21. doi:
  LI C, GUO R P. Effects of inulin on performance, lipid levels and carcass quality of finishing pigs[J]. China FeedChina Feed, 2014, (20): 19-21. doi:
25. [25]
  唐青松, 肖明飞, 易宏波, 熊海涛, 黄加珍, 徐娥. 饲粮添加缩合单宁对肉鸡生长性能、肉品质、免疫功能、抗氧化功能及肠道形态的影响[J]. 动物营养学报动物营养学报, 2021, 33(6): 3228-3236. doi:
  TANG Q S, XIAO M F, YI H B, XIONG H T, HUANG J Z, XU E. Effects of dietary condensed tannin on growth performance, meat quality, immune function, antioxidant function and intestinal morphology ofbroilers[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal NutritionChinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(6): 3228-3236. doi:
26. [26]
  CAVA R, LADERO L, CANTERO V, RAMIREZ M R. Assessment of different dietary fibers (tomato fiber, beet root fiber, and inulin) for the manufacture of chopped cooked chicken products[J]. Journal of Food ScienceJournal of Food Science, 2012, 77(4): C346-C352. doi:
27. [27]
  曹泽虹, 董玉玮, 王卫东, 李超, 吴双双, 刘庆. 牛蒡菊糖的提取及其抗氧化性能的研究[J]. 农业机械农业机械, 2011, (24): 135-139.
  CAO Z H, DONG Y W, WANG W D, LI C, WU S S, LIU Q. Study on extraction of inulin from burdock and its antioxidant activity[J]. Farm MachineryFarm Machinery, 2011, (24): 135-139.
28. [28]
  李斐, 杨万宗, 田黛君, 桂瑞麒, 李庆敏, 周玉香. 荞麦秸秆饲粮中添加甘露寡糖对滩羊生长性能、消化代谢、屠宰性能和肉品质的影响[J]. 动物营养学报动物营养学报, 2021, 33(4): 2126-2135. doi:
  LI F, YANG W Z, TIAN D J, GUI R Q, LI Q M, ZHOU Y X. Effects of mannan oligosaccharides in buckwheat straw diets on growth performance, digestion and metabolism, slaughter performance and meat quality of tan sheep[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal NutritionChinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(4): 2126-2135. doi:
1. [1]
  徐嘉宾 , 年芳 , 王维民 , 唐德富 , 柳银强 . 不同日增重湖羊的生长性能、屠宰性能和肌肉品质. 草业科学, doi:
2. [2]
  马晓文 , 周文静 , 刘鑫 , 寇宇斐 , 张智安 , 李发弟 , 李飞 . 大麦粉碎粒度对育肥湖羊生长育肥性能和养分消化及肉品质的影响. 草业科学, doi:
3. [3]
  刘宁波 , 赵亥山 , 郭磊 , 王霞 , 李讨讨 , 马友记 . 3种颗粒型全混合日粮对湖羊生产性能和瘤胃组织发育的影响. 草业科学, doi:
4. [4]
  赵新钢 , 郭艳萍 , 刘明 , 张灿 , 罗海玲 . 荒漠草原放牧与舍饲对滩羊屠宰性能与肉品质的影响. 草业科学, doi:
5. [5]
  占今舜 , 詹康 , 杨富裕 , 钟小军 , 霍俊宏 , 严学兵 . 饲粮添加益生菌对山羊屠宰性能、肉品质和器官发育的影响. 草业科学, doi:
6. [6]
  周文静 , 袁泽湖 , 李熙成 , 郭淑珍 , 兰贵生 , 闫佰鹏 , 李发弟 , 李万宏 , 乐祥鹏 . 3种不同类型藏羊的屠宰性能和肉品质的比较分析. 草业科学, doi:
7. [7]
  谢荣菊 , 王建平 , 刘宁 , 张飞可 . 日粮中添加乡土草对獭兔健康、屠宰性能和消化系统的影响. 草业科学, doi:
8. [8]
  李彦珍 , 刘婷 , 段鹏伟 , 郑琛 . 不同中性洗涤纤维来源开食料对湖羊羔羊生长性能和养分消化代谢的影响. 草业科学, doi:
9. [9]
  吴涛 , 柳永丽 , 赵芳芳 . 不同添加剂对菊芋茎叶青贮品质及营养价值的影响. 草业科学, doi:
10. [10]
  范慧玉 , 徐建风 , 王静 , 张振东 , 张建军 , 沈振峰 , 张帆 , 刘婷 , 郑琛 . 饲粮添加共轭亚油酸对湖羊屠宰性能及胃肠器官指数的影响. 草业科学, doi:
11. [11]
  邓素媛 , 易显凤 , 庞天德 , 史静 , 丘金花 , 黄志朝 . 发酵葛藤饲喂肉猪效果分析. 草业科学, doi:
12. [12]
  赵芳芳 , 张海龙 , 胡江 , 权金鹏 , 李少斌 , 赵志东 , 左志 . 秸秆颗粒替代部分玉米青贮对肉牛育肥效果的影响. 草业科学, doi:
13. [13]
  陈小连 , 占今舜 , 曾艳兵 , 周泉勇 , 赵品 , 刘林秀 , 宋琼莉 , 邹志恒 . 发酵菜籽粕对番鸭生长性能和血液指标的影响. 草业科学, doi:
14. [14]
  韩建成 , 蔺红玲 , 江汉青 , 贾汝敏 , 汪春 , 周汉林 , 贺军军 , 江杨 , 李海亮 , 陈永辉 , 李秀芬 . 砂仁茎叶对雷州黑山羊生长性能及血液生化指标的影响. 草业科学, doi:
15. [15]
  戴东文 , 王书祥 , 王迅 , 杨英魁 , 柴沙驼 . 精料补饲水平对暖季放牧牦牛生长性能、血清生化指标及养殖收益的影响. 草业科学, doi:
16. [16]
  龚建平 , 龙伟 , 吕亚宁 , 吴东 , 黄玉林 , 陈小连 . 葛叶粉对肉鸡生长性能及血清生化、抗氧化和免疫指标的影响. 草业科学, doi:
17. [17]
  刘大林 , 孙启鑫 , 邵将 , 陈鸣晖 , 张华 . 镉胁迫对两种狼尾草不同生育时期生长性能、光合作用特征及镉吸收转运差异的影响. 草业科学, doi:
18. [18]
  成启明 , 冯骁骋 , 格根图 , 侯美玲 , 范文强 , 杜珠梅 , 贾玉山 . 草地植物添加剂对肉牛生长性能的影响. 草业科学, doi:
19. [19]
  陈玲 , 王璐慧 , 国慧 , 杨振安 . 放牧对高寒草甸植被–土壤酚类物质组成及含量的影响. 草业科学, doi:
20. [20]
  吕梦云 , 胡耀 , 陈伟 , 欧阳克蕙 , 黎雄 , 熊小文 , 温庆琪 . 松针多糖对肉鸡生产性能和免疫功能的影响. 草业科学, doi:

凯时66

表 1 基础日粮及营养水平

Table 1. Basal diet and nutrient levels

项目 Item	含量 Content
原料 Ingredient
黄贮玉米秸秆 Yellow corn stalks/%	8
苜蓿干草 Alfalfa hay/%	22
玉米 Corn/%	34
豆粕 Soybean meal/%	14
米糠 Rice bran/%	3
胡麻饼 Sesame cake/%	3
玉米酒糟蛋白 Distillers’ dried grains with solubles/%	12
食盐 Salt/%	0.7
添加剂预混料 Premix/%	0.5
膨化尿素 Puffing urea/%	1.3
碳酸氢钠 NaHCO₃/%	1.5
营养水平 Nutrient level
消化能 Digestible energy (DE)/(MJ·kg ⁻¹)	12.01
粗蛋白 Crude protein (CP)/%	18.17
钙 Ca/%	0.31
磷 P/%	0.3
预混料为每千克饲料提供：维生素A，400～1 000 IU；维生素D3，75～400 IU；维生素E，0.6～10.0 mg；碘，0.075～0.425 mg；硒，0.015～0.050 mg；钴，0.05～0.20 mg；锰，4.1～15.0 mg；Fe，4.50～18.08 mg；锌，7.5～12.0 mg；铜，0.35～1.40 mg；Ca，0.3～1.2 mg；P，0.075～2.500 mg。　Premix is supplied per kilogram of feed: Vitamin A, 400～1 000 IU; Vitamin D3, 75～400 IU; Vitamin E, 0.6～10 mg; Iodine, 0.075～0.425 mg; Selenium, 0.015～0.05 mg; Cobalt, 0.05～0.20 mg; Manganese, 4.1～15 mg; Fe, 4.5～18.08 mg; Zinc, 7.5～12 mg; Copper, 0.35～1.4 mg; Ca, 0.3～1.2 mg; P, 0.075～2.5 mg.

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 菊粉与单宁对湖羊生长性能以及屠宰性能的影响

Table 2. Effects of inulin and tannin on growth performance and slaughter performance of Hu sheep

项目 Items	对照组 Control	试验Ⅰ组 Group Ⅰ	试验Ⅱ组 Group Ⅱ	试验Ⅲ组 Group Ⅲ	P
干物质采食 Dry matter intake (DMI)/(kg·d⁻¹)	1.587 ± 0.103	1.654 ± 0.057	1.678 ± 0.054	1.674 ± 0.033	0.785
平均日增重 Average daily gain (ADG)/(g·d⁻¹)	21.503 ± 0.034	19.33 ± 0.020	21.503 ± 0.148	21.001 ± 0.032	0.928
料重比 Feed conversion ratio (FCR)/%	8.272 ± 1.239	9.081 ± 1.124	7.924 ± 0.365	8.528 ± 1.034	0.868
宰前活重 Live weight before slaughter/kg	36.514 ± 2.779	35.782 ± 1.697	36.183 ± 2.175	34.782 ± 1.672	0.945
胴体重 Carcass weight/kg	17.534 ± 1.529	17.327 ± 0.975	16.703 ± 0.961	17.503 ± 0.687	0.943
屠宰率 Slaughter rate/%	47.923 ± 0.016	48.324 ± 0.006	46.243 ± 0.008	50.422 ± 0.005	0.056
眼肌面积 Eye area/cm²	18.144 ± 1.931	18.287 ± 4.106	16.938 ± 1.243	16.909 ± 1.768	0.965
同行不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)；下同。　Different lowercase letters within the same row indicate a significant difference between different treatments at the 0.05 level; this is applicable for the following tables as well.

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 菊粉与单宁对湖羊肉品质的影响

Table 3. Effects of inulin and tannin on meat quality of Hu sheep

项目 Items	对照组 Control	试验I组 Group Ⅰ	试验Ⅱ组 Group Ⅱ	试验Ⅲ组 Group Ⅲ	P
熟肉率 Rate of cooked meat/%	37.632 ± 0.005^ab	38.231 ± 0.006^a	37.514 ± 0.007^ab	35.823 ± 0.006^b	0.042
系水力 Water holding capacity/%	15.074 ± 0.013^b	17.793 ± 0.017^ab	21.218 ± 0.007^a	14.301 ± 0.012^b	< 0.001
剪切力 Shear force/kgf	5.301 ± 0.172^a	4.892 ± 0.158^a	4.367 ± 0.171^b	4.338 ± 0.208^b	< 0.001
pH_45min	5.921 ± 0.068^a	5.704 ± 0.072^b	5.391 ± 0.068^c	5.573 ± 0.040^bc	< 0.001
L*24	30.828 ± 0.516^b	33.083 ± 0.385^a	33.548 ± 0.535^a	30.901 ± 0.547^b	< 0.001
a*24	18.001 ± 0.191^b	20.043 ± 0.188^a	19.362 ± 0.301^a	18.463 ± 0.366^b	< 0.001
b*24	7.423 ± 0.282^b	8.863 ± 0.273^a	8.763 ± 0.090^a	7.341 ± 0.005^b	< 0.001

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 菊粉与单宁对湖羊营养物质表观消化率的影响

Table 4. Effects of inulin and tannin on nutrient apparent digestibility of Hu sheep

项目 Item	对照组 Control	试验I组 Group Ⅰ	试验Ⅱ组 Group Ⅱ	试验Ⅲ组 Group Ⅲ	P
干物质 Dry matter (DM)/%	47.941 ± 0.010^a	47.023 ± 0.015^a	47.323 ± 0.012^a	27.081 ± 0.019^b	< 0.001
粗蛋白 Crude protein (CP)/%	63.866 ± 0.018^a	60.327 ± 0.014^a	60.084 ± 0.012^a	53.702 ± 0.015^b	< 0.001
粗脂肪 Ether extract (EE)/%	73.782 ± 0.014^a	70.904 ± 0.011^a	73.001 ± 0.015^a	57.613 ± 0.029^b	< 0.001
中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (NDF)/%	23.114 ± 0.015^b	20.443 ± 0.008b^c	29.721 ± 0.014^a	16.204 ± 0.009^c	< 0.001
酸性洗涤纤维 Detergent fiber (ADF)/%	47.943 ± 0.011^b	47.162 ± 0.012^b	51.291 ± 0.014^a	30.503 ± 0.006^c	< 0.001

下载: 导出CSV

凯时66

点击查看大图

计量

PDF下载量: 4
文章访问数: 33
HTML全文浏览量: 23

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

凯时66

声明！

菊粉和单宁对肉羊生长、屠宰性能及肉品质的影响

作者简介: 梁雪(1997-)，女,甘肃民勤人,在读硕士生,研究方向为草食动物生产与改良。E-mail: 15294163997@139.com

通讯作者: 李少斌(1983-)，男, 山西汾阳人 副研究员, 博士, 主要研究方向草食动物遗传育种。Email: lisb@gasu.edu.cn

English

Effects of inulin and tannin on growth, slaughter performance, and meat quality of Mutton sheep

Corresponding author: LI Shaobin E-mail: lisb@gasu.edu.cn

凯时66

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

通讯作者: 李少斌(1983-)，男, 山西汾阳人副研究员, 博士, 主要研究方向草食动物遗传育种。Email: lisb@gasu.edu.cn

Corresponding author: LI Shaobin　E-mail: lisb@gasu.edu.cn